Constitutional Measure No. 1 (Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 4007, 2025 Session Laws, Ch. 615)
Vote figures not captured from an official source (ND SOS results site is JS-driven). Ballotpedia (via search) reports 77,141 Yes (66.42%) / 38,995 No (33.58%) — unofficial, not recorded in result.
Ballot prints generic "Yes – Means you approve the measure as summarized above." yes_means/no_means use the SOS guide's "What your vote means" statements (official, SOS).
North Dakota publishes no official pro/con arguments.
Constitutional Measure No. 1 (Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 4007, 2025 Session Laws, Ch. 615) This constitutional measure would amend and reenact section 9 of article III and section 16 of article IV of the Constitution of North Dakota, relating to requiring each resolution adopted by the legislative assembly proposing a constitutional amendment and each initiative petition and measure proposing a constitutional amendment be comprised of a single subject. The proposed amendment is summarized as follows: constitutional amendments would be limited to one subject. The Secretary of State shall not approve an initiative petition for circulation if the Secretary determines that the proposed amendment comprises more than one subject. Additionally, the legislative assembly is required to limit proposed amendments to the constitution to one subject. The estimated fiscal impact of this measure is none.
A “YES” vote on Constitutional Measure No. 1 means that future initiated petitions and ballot measures for changes to the North Dakota Constitution would be limited to one subject area.
A “NO” vote on Constitutional Measure No. 1 means that future initiated petitions and ballot measures for the North Dakota Constitution could contain changes for multiple subject areas and not be limited to one subject.
Not published by the state
The estimated fiscal impact of this measure is none.
Not published by the state
Not published by the state
Both columns use the same layout. Text is quoted from the official state guide. Views expressed belong to the argument authors.