All states · Missouri

Amendment 5 (Aug 4, 2026 primary): Income Tax Elimination and Sales Tax Adjustments

Income Tax Elimination and Sales Tax Adjustments

No official arguments Failed — Yes 233,965 (16.687%) / No 1,168,110 (83.313%); official results as announced by the Board of State Canvassers on August 25, 2026 (3,235 of 3,235 precincts) Constitutional amendment Tax & Revenue As of 2026-10-10
Data note

MO SOS uses the ballot question itself as the official ballot title; official_title set to NCSL short title for display.

Result updated 2026-10-10 from official MO SOS results (https://enr.sos.mo.gov/; PDF printout browser-downloaded by Anil, manual-downloads/MO-2026-aug-primary-official-results.pdf). Totals verified with pdftotext and match the figures Anil supplied. Previous news-sourced figures (Failed — Yes 233,309 (16.7%) / No 1,165,085 (83.3%)) differed slightly and are superseded. enr.sos.mo.gov is bot-blocked to curl (403); loads in a real browser.

Missouri publishes fair ballot language (yes/no meaning) and a fiscal note summary; no official pro/con arguments. Source: Proposed by 103rd General Assembly (Second Regular Session) SS SCS HCS HJR 173 & 174]; [View Certificate of Official Ballot Title

Ballot text (Official ballot title (question))

Shall the Missouri Constitution be amended to: Require legislative phase-out of the individual state income tax based on revenue growth, and authorize the expansion of sales and use taxes; Curtail constitutional limits on taxing goods and services; and Require local tax rate cuts without reducing school funding if local sales tax revenue increases?

What a YES vote means

A “yes” vote will amend the Missouri Constitution to require legislative phase-out and elimination of the individual state income tax based on revenue growth, and authorize the expansion of sales and use taxes; curtail constitutional limits on taxing goods and services; and require local tax rate cuts without reducing school funding if local sales tax revenue increases.

What a NO vote means

A “no” vote will not amend the Missouri Constitution to require legislative phase-out and elimination of the individual state income tax based on revenue growth; and will not authorize the expansion of sales and use taxes.

Explanatory statement

Not published by the state

Fiscal impact

The proposal has no direct impact on state or local tax revenue. If passed, implementing legislation will have an unknown impact to state and local tax revenue. If implemented, state government entities expect a reduction of $57,000 annually in income tax check-off donations and implementation costs of at least $100,000.

Argument FOR

Not published by the state

Argument AGAINST

Not published by the state

Both columns use the same layout. Text is quoted from the official state guide. Views expressed belong to the argument authors.

Find more info